Skip to content

Engineering · Supply chain · Project controls

Know your true project status — in real time.

Aardvark connects engineering, procurement and quality into one cloud data environment — integrating your schedule, documents, purchase orders and inspections to drive automated milestone reporting, dashboards and supply-chain risk early-warning.

Built for oil & gas, nuclear & major capital projectsISO 27001 · Salesforce platform

Key users — operators, contractors & suppliers on major capital projects

BP
Chevron
ExxonMobil
Wood
Petrofac
Schneider Electric
Emerson
Veolia
Sulzer
SCM
PEG
GPS
Bechtel
Fluor
KBR
Kent
BP
Chevron
ExxonMobil
Wood
Petrofac
Schneider Electric
Emerson
Veolia
Sulzer
SCM
PEG
GPS
Bechtel
Fluor
KBR
Kent

The Problem

You can't manage what you can't measure.

Major projects over $1bn routinely overrun — EY found 64% average cost overrun and 73% schedule delay across 205 megaprojects. The reason is a data gap exactly where risk is highest.

Our mission is to resolve the root causes — so clients deliver on time and on budget. The biggest issue is closing the data gap exactly where the risk is highest.

01

No real-time supply-chain data

Suppliers report late, in their own formats. Without live data from the supply chain, you're managing blind exactly where it matters most.

02

Lack of data drives risk

Critical engineering interfaces depend on that supply-chain data. When it's missing or stale, interdependencies stall and dormant risk compounds unseen.

03

Optimism-biased reporting

Supplier-reported status is structurally optimistic. Teams wait on monthly reports built from “dead” data and never see true progress.

What's actually driving it — industry research

25%
Organisation
  • Poor measurement and reporting
  • Lack of real-time insights
  • Lack of structure / poor efficiency
25%
People
  • Waiting for data, approvals / signatures
  • Overwhelmed with email
  • Poor handover between teams and companies
25%
Governance
  • Difficult to measure corporate values
  • Basic processes not standardised
  • Unreliable data
13%
Systems
  • Too many manual processes
  • Lack of digital adoption
12%
Supply Chain
  • Poor vendor quality and vendor supervision
  • Lack of process & systems for control
The data gap sits in post-order delivery & construction

Engineering and procurement have live data. Once equipment is on order and moving through the supply chain — where risk is highest, and where engineering interfaces critically depend on it — true status disappears.

Aardvark does the heavy lifting — you make the decisions.

It captures, structures and tracks real-time supply-chain data and the engineering interfaces that depend on it. The platform takes the administration off your plate, so every decision rests on unbiased, real-time evidence — not optimistic supplier reports.

The Platform

One real-time data environment. Every stakeholder, one source of truth.

Aardvark puts Company, Contractor and sub-suppliers in a single cloud platform on Salesforce. We integrate with your existing systems — we don't replace them. Capture once, and the whole project sees the same live picture.

Engineeringlive data
Procurementlive data
Equipment deliverythe gap — now closed
Construction / supply chainthe gap — now closed
Completion & handoverlive data

Data structure

Everything hangs off one structure.

Programme
Project
Package / PO
Tag

Every action, ITP line item, document and inspection links to a Tag — and rolls up automatically through Package, Project and Programme.

Integrate, don't duplicate

Your data sources, connected at source.

Aardvark imports and links the systems you already run — then does the heavy lifting. It reads across document batch groups, individual docs, milestones, ITP line items, tags and action closures, and computes live status automatically. No re-keying, no parallel registers, no spreadsheets.

Primavera P6 — scheduleDocument managementPurchase ordersMan-hoursAsset tags & MTOExcel / CSVQA / QC records

Hundreds of extra data points per PO, calculated automatically — so risk can be assessed in real time, the moment the data is available. What was once an opaque phase becomes crystal clear: cleverly managed data flow, straight to the people making the decisions.

The heavy lifting · live status engine

Aardvark reads across every source — continuously — and computes status automatically:

Document batch groups & individual docsCode 1–4
ITP line items — welding, NDE, painting…W/H points
Milestones & PO line itemsrolled up
Asset tags & action closureslinked
→ Real-time status, recalculated continuouslylive

Capabilities

One platform, built around the work that actually moves a project.

Each capability solves a discrete job — and shares data with the rest in real time.

Action Workflows

Standardise and digitise every inter-company approval and exchange with bespoke, part-based workflows — each party owns its response part. Auto-numbered, revision-controlled, with private internal review and digital sign-off, built for fast adoption with minimal training.

  • EQ
  • RFI
  • NCR
  • CAR
  • OBS
  • PUNCH
  • IRN
  • TAF
  • MMT

Package & PO Management

Coordinate and performance-manage the supply chain across the full PO lifecycle — from RFQ, TBE/CBE and award through delivery to final destination. Programme-wide visibility of dates, line items, quantities, tags and float.

  • Pre/post-award dates
  • ROS
  • Incoterms
  • VOWD
  • Payment milestones

Digital ITP — method of measurement

The digital Inspection & Test Plan links quality workflows to scope (MTO & tags) and time (P6). Thousands of manufacturing and construction steps are progressively verified — giving a smooth, accurate S-curve and tight schedule control.

  • Witness / Hold points
  • Progressive QC
  • Production rates
  • Real-time roll-up

Quality & Inspection Management

Automates the QC process end-to-end: inspection notification, NCRs, observations and punch lists, with a library of digital QA/QC and HSE compliance checklists collated, reviewed and approved on workflows.

  • Inspection coordination
  • Checklists
  • Punch rundown
  • OSHA HSE
  • Audit

Real-Time Milestone Reporting

Sequential mini stage-gates across the PO critical path — drawing automatically on ITP W/H points, document status and workflow data. Tangible, measurable progress generated continuously instead of cranked through spreadsheets.

  • PO award → FCA/CDD
  • Code 1/2 docs
  • Rundown activities
  • Auto-collated

Business Intelligence & Dashboards

Tailored real-time dashboards and automated landing pages, drawing on every workflow and integrated source. Status by PO, project or programme — accessible in the browser from a single role-based portal.

  • Live dashboards
  • Heat maps
  • S-curves
  • Scheduled reports

Inter-company workflows

Standardise and digitise every exchange — bespoke to how you work.

Replace email, PDFs and transmittals with structured digital workflows configured to your project's needs. Standardise communication once, digitise it, and every approval runs the same fast, auditable path between Company, Contractor and suppliers.

Build digital ITPs by product type and a library of QA/QC and HSE checklists — then link every transaction to your asset tags and document management. The result is a fully integrated ecosystem of data, not another silo.

  • Bespoke, part-based templates — each party owns its response part
  • Digital ITPs configured by product type — pump, vessel, valve, package
  • QA/QC & HSE checklists collated, reviewed and approved on workflow
  • Linked to tags, documents, PO line items and the schedule at source
A typical 4-part workflow · 3D Model ReviewApproved
1234
Part 1 · Tag details & model markupContractor
Part 2 · Company reviewApproved
Part 3 · Evidence & referencesContractor
Part 4 · Final closeoutApproved
Approval history · digital sign-off
Review request approved — Company reviewer
Approval request approved — Company approver
Company closed the action

The workflow library

Every inter-company exchange, digitised.

Each action runs on a structured, auto-numbered, revision-controlled workflow — bespoke to your project and your parties. The current library spans every action type across engineering, quality, inspection, safety, commercial and field operations:

Engineering queries & change

  • EQEngineering Query — bidirectional
  • RFIRequest for Information
  • DCNDesign Change Notice
  • 3D3D Model Review Tags

Quality & non-conformance

  • NCRNon-Conformance Report
  • CARCorrective Action Request
  • OBSObservation
  • CHK_QCLQC Checklists — Company & Contractor

Inspection & release

  • INInspection Notification
  • PUNCHPunch Item — Company / Contractor
  • IRNInspection Release Note
  • MMTMaterial Movement Ticket

Safety & hazard management

  • HZDHAZID Action
  • HZPHAZOP Action
  • LOPLOPA Action

Commercial & change control

  • TAFTask Approval Form
  • PCRMajor Projects Change Request
  • SOService Orders
  • BTRBusiness Travel Request

Field operations

  • SQYSite Query
  • FTQField Technical Query

Speed · the interface

Speed is essential. So Aardvark owns the interface.

Major projects span many companies across the supply chain — each on a different system. Aardvark cuts through that complexity by owning and leveraging the interface between them. It digitally captures the inter-company interface data — workflows, ITP witness/hold points, document submissions, check sheets and more — then pushes it through deep analytics to deliver the message simply and meaningfully to every user.

CompanyConnected stakeholdersDigital workflowsIntegrated data

Company sits at the centre as the decision-maker. Contractors form the inner ring and their sub-contractors the outer ring — so a change request flows inward, sub-contractor → contractor → Company, for approval, with every step captured.

New data others can't capture

Granular measurement, a smoother S-curve.

Suppliers run their own ITP formats and report unstructured status — so the best most projects manage is document counts and PO dates, cranked manually through spreadsheets.

Aardvark structures and captures this data progressively, automatically, across hundreds of documents and workflows — turning the supply chain's “dead” reporting into live, verified progress.

  • Thousands of steps planned and measured per package
  • ITP planned dates ignored — only actual achievement counts
  • Status aggregated across all packages in real time
Digital ITP · Pressure Vessel
146 lines
146
Total lines
32
Closed
116
W & H
1
Overdue
Progress line items
0Pre-inspection meetingClosedH
2.1Materials — receipt & certsClosedW
2.2Material traceabilityClosedW
88Dimensional inspectionOverdueH
146Final inspection & IRNNot startedH
+ 141 more lines · W&H, S/M&R filters

Real-time milestone reporting

Mini stage-gates on the critical path — measured automatically.

A 12–18 month PO is broken into sequential milestones of maturity. Each draws live on ITP W/H points, document status and workflow data — so progress is recalculated continuously rather than gathered and cranked through spreadsheets.

Contractual
PO Award
Engineering
Key Docs Code 2
Procurement
Sub-orders Placed
Manufacturing
ITP W/H In-Progress
MC / FAT
MC Walkdown
Shipping
IRN Issued · FCA
Automated Milestone Report · Chemical Injection Package18 milestones · live data · recalculated 15/06/2026
MSCategoryMilestoneGateProgressΔ weekForecast
1ContractualPO Award 100%0.0%
3EngineeringKey Docs — Code 2 Achieved 100%0.0%
5Engineering60% 3D Model Actions Closed 60%+6.0%09/07
7EngineeringInterface Docs — Code 1 Achieved 45%+2.5%21/07
12ManufacturingITP Witness/Hold In-Progress 30%+4.0%02/09
16MC / FATMC Walkdown Completed 0%0.0%14/11
18ShippingIRN Issued · FCA Achieved 0%0.0%06/12
Overdue In progress Complete Not started Not applicable

High-level analytics

Performance management for the supply chain and engineering.

A consistent way of looking at the same metrics across every PO, project and programme — surfaced by exception, so teams act on what's abnormal instead of drowning in data.

Planned vs Actual

  • S-curves for progress
  • ITP W/H point curve
  • Procurement key dates
  • Inspection calendar

Process control

  • Defects per million
  • SLA on reviews
  • RFIs by discipline
  • Missed / waived inspections

Performance

  • Right-first-time rate
  • Action debottlenecking
  • Root-cause analysis
  • Full drill-down

Handover

  • Punch rundown curves
  • Outstanding works list
  • Geospatial inspections
  • Error carry-over prevented

Hours by Role & Action Type

Manhours consumed per role — originator, reviewer, approver, respondee, coordinator — and per action type. The raw input to the efficiency case.

Effort · manhours

Manhours by Group

Effort by engineering group and discipline team across the whole project — see exactly where the load sits.

Effort · by team

Average Turnaround

Days to respond, review and approve — by role and by user. Objective SLA performance, not anecdote.

SLA · turnaround days

Activity Timeline

Workload and throughput over time, by week — spot surges, bottlenecks and resourcing gaps early.

Throughput · weekly

Document Review Hours by Discipline

Review effort per discipline — where the document burden really falls, and how it tracks against capacity.

Document review · effort

Supplier Metrics Benchmark

Benchmark suppliers against each other on quality, responsiveness and delivery — a consistent scorecard across the supply chain.

Supply chain · benchmark

Dashboards & landing pages

Automated landing pages — for every role and every level.

One role-based portal aggregates the same live data upward — from a person's daily action inbox to a programme-wide portfolio. Deep on engineering, vendor performance and individual-engineer performance. Every page is generated automatically from integrated sources; nobody builds a report by hand.

Personal

Your landing page

  • Today's brief & what's slipping
  • Action inbox by priority
  • Document review queue
  • Week-ahead KPIs & inspections
  • Company / Contractor lens
Project

Project dashboard

  • Discipline progress & S-curves
  • Key milestones
  • Risks & DCRs
  • Cost summary & TAF status
  • Management summary
Engineering

Engineering dashboard

  • EQ, RFI & DCN status and closeout
  • Document status by Code 1–4
  • 3D model review actions & rundown
  • Engineering burn rate by CO
  • Interface register & lessons learned
Procurement

Procurement dashboard

  • Pre-order pipeline: MR → PR → RFP → BCD → TBE → OR
  • Average TBE duration by discipline
  • VDR performance
  • Critical float past ROS
  • Post-order major updates
Programme

Programme dashboard

  • Portfolio status across projects
  • Engineering burn rate by CO
  • Cross-project risks
  • Productivity comparison
  • Programme procurement view
Performance

Vendor & people performance

  • Supplier metrics benchmark
  • Vendor document (VDR) performance
  • Average turnaround by user & role
  • Right-first-time by reviewer
  • Manhours by role & individual

The PO Dashboard

Every purchase order gets a living dashboard.

One page per PO that auto-populates from across the platform — information, schedule, costs, subcontractors, tags, engineering, quality and mechanical completion. No manual assembly, ever. This is where the supply chain stops being opaque.

PO DashboardPO InformationScheduleCostsSubcontractorsTagsEngineeringQualityMechanical CompletionPhotos & Attachments
PO Information
PO date16/05/2024
Delivery — planned07/06/2025
Delivery — forecast31/07/2025
ROS — forecast05/09/2025
Float (on delivery)
Incoterms · package mgr · 3D model · attachments
Schedule · WBS Gantt
WBS activities linked to ITP line items · P6
Engineering · Document status
1,149 docs · planned · forecast · actual · by Code 1–4
Engineering · EQ closeout
Total EQs62
Avg days open58
Pending on Company / Contractor · interface requests
Quality · Manufacturing W/H
Planned vs actual · 97% · 128 W/H closed
Mech. Completion · Punch rundown
181 closed · P50 21d · P90 76d · rundown curve

The value

Less friction. Faster decisions. Protected value.

Replacing email/PDF/DMS workflows with centralised digital workflows cuts handling effort by an estimated 50–80%. On a reference project — 5,397 workflows and 47,988 transactions over three years — that translated to substantial measured value.

50–80%
Reduction in workflow handling effort vs email / DMS
32,400
Labour hours saved (mid-range)
≈$20M
Total value protection — circa 10% of project capex
47,988
Transactions processed across 104 users

Figures are illustrative / representative — derived from the Aardvark workflow efficiency study and platform transaction log · supported by FMI/PlanGrid (2018), McKinsey (2017/2019), EY megaproject study. Confirm before publishing.

From the field

Built from the feedback of major-project managers, lead engineers, quality, supply chain and package managers, and construction superintendents.

Having automated real-time information at the touch of a button lets the team know where we are right now — I no longer wait for the Contractor's monthly report.
Client Quality Manager
The idea of the tool is great — exactly what a project like this needs.
Contractor Project Manager
Information and status, all in one location.
Contractor Lead C&I Engineer
Very useful — a great initiative.
Contractor Process Engineer
Complete status in a single PO page. Records retrievable at any time. Very convenient to use.
Contractor Quality Manager
Evidence of actual progress. Saves paper and time, stores history, and you never miss actions.
Client Field Inspector

See Aardvark on your project.

Book a walkthrough with our team — we'll tailor it to your engineering, procurement and quality workflows.